Auto Insurance
Auto Insurance
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars'
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Auto Insurance Forum Index -> Classic Cars
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Willy Eckerslyke
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

Quote:
Those who object to the VED also seem to object to the idea of paying for
annual registration too - or even the principle of it even when free, like
SORN.

Careful with those generalisations Dave. You can't really lump
_everyone_ you disagree with into the same pot.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Steve Firth
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

Richard Porter <dontusethis@address.uk.invalid> wrote:

Quote:

No, I want a public service broadcaster that caters for as many
viewing preferences as possible over the course of a week, and doesn't
just go for instantaneous ratings.

Not the BBC then, because the BBC has been a rating whore for decades.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dave Plowman (News)
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:34 am    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

In article <ZS7J1fBFHYFIFwRm@oroboros.demon.co.uk>,
Chris Morriss <crsm@oroboros.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
Dave Plowman appears to be a perfectly reasonable chap, but he is
somewhere to the left of Pol Pot. To those of us of a more libertarian
viewpoint, he gets rather tiresome.

Nice to know you agree with Firth that all taxation is theft and

'Taxation doesn't exist to make poor people better off. It exists for two
reasons, so that politicians can prove to themselves that they have
power over ordinary people's lives and to put money into the Treasury to
pay for the stupid ideas of politicians'.

But perhaps you simply didn't read or understand his statments.

--
*'Progress' and 'Change' are not synonyms.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Jim Warren
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:38 am    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

Richard Porter wrote:

Quote:

I thought we'd nailed that one before. The AP box most certainly does
have a three element torque converter. I could drive it in fourth in
slow moving traffic using only the torque converter. You can't do that
with a fluid flywheel. They were normally used in cars like Daimlers,
Lanchesters and Rileys with preselector boxes.

And the Rover 105R


Jim
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dave Plowman (News)
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:39 am    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

In article <cf111a974f.news@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter <dontusethis@address.uk.invalid> wrote:
Quote:
That's because it didn't have a torque convertor but a fluid flywheel
instead - doesn't cushion changes as well, as many an old Rolls or Merc
owner would testify too also.

I thought we'd nailed that one before. The AP box most certainly does
have a three element torque converter. I could drive it in fourth in
slow moving traffic using only the torque converter. You can't do that
with a fluid flywheel. They were normally used in cars like Daimlers,
Lanchesters and Rileys with preselector boxes.

A fluid flywheel allows that if the selector mechanism does. In a similar
way as you can start a manual Mini in top gear by slipping the clutch.

The original description of the AP box stated it had a fluid flywheel
instead of torque convertor to reduce losses - and hence the use of four
speeds when all other TC autos of the time had three - or less.

--
*Why is the word abbreviation so long?

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Steve Firth
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 am    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

Dave Plowman (News) <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
But perhaps you simply didn't read or understand his statments.

Or perhaps you have a naive and rather trusting view about the real
reason that taxation exists.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dave Plowman (News)
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

In article <1ig4vba.1dnxflfauyp51N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>,
Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
But perhaps you simply didn't read or understand his statments.

Or perhaps you have a naive and rather trusting view about the real
reason that taxation exists.

Unlike you I don't see only in black and white.

--
*I don't suffer from insanity -- I'm a carrier

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


:Jerry:
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:23 am    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4f97bbd247dave@davenoise.co.uk...
Quote:
In article <1ig4vba.1dnxflfauyp51N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>,
Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote:
But perhaps you simply didn't read or understand his statments.

Or perhaps you have a naive and rather trusting view about the real
reason that taxation exists.

Unlike you I don't see only in black and white.


One advantage of being a sound engineer I suppose, no one notices how
short sighted one is (or more likely becomes [1])?... :~P
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Steve Firth
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:14 am    Post subject: Re: Government response to petition 'Classic-Cars' Reply with quote

Dave Plowman (News) <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
In article <1ig4vba.1dnxflfauyp51N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>,
Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote:
But perhaps you simply didn't read or understand his statments.

Or perhaps you have a naive and rather trusting view about the real
reason that taxation exists.

Unlike you I don't see only in black and white.

Just black.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Auto Insurance Forum Index -> Classic Cars All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

106 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group